Mechanisms
Elevated Lp(a) is linked to a roughly fourfold higher risk of ischaemic stroke and thrombosis in children, though screening guidelines remain inconsistent, a review (Curr Atheroscler Rep 2023)
Original title: Lipoprotein (a): Does It Play a Role in Pediatric Ischemic Stroke and Thrombosis?
This review examines Lp(a) role in paediatric ischaemic stroke and thromboembolism. Unlike in adults, where atherosclerotic plaque burden drives thrombotic risk, antifibrinolytic and proinflammatory properties of Lp(a) appear more important in children. Recent studies indicate that children with elevated Lp(a) have an approximately fourfold higher risk of incident thrombosis and ischaemic stroke, as well as a higher risk of recurrent events, though this is not well established in neonates. Despite this elevated risk, paediatric Lp(a) screening guidelines vary widely between medical societies and countries, reflecting inconclusive evidence beyond observational studies and the absence of therapies specifically for children with elevated Lp(a). The authors call for further research into the mechanisms, screening approach, and long-term consequences of elevated paediatric Lp(a).
Original abstract
Purpose Of Review: The goal of this paper is to describe the current understanding of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), clinical practice guidelines, and the potential pathophysiological mechanisms that appear to increase the risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events, specifically within the pediatric population.
Recent Findings: The proatherogenic and pro-thrombotic properties of Lp(a) may increase the risk of atherothrombotic disease. In adults, atherosclerotic plaques increase thrombotic risk, but antifibrinolytic and proinflammatory properties appear to have an important role in children. Although it is not well established in neonates, recent studies indicate the risk of incident thrombosis and ischemic stroke are approximately fourfold higher in children with elevated Lp(a) which also increases their risk of recurrent events. Despite this higher risk, Pediatric Lp(a) screening guidelines continue to vary among different medical societies and countries. The inconsistency is likely related to inconclusive evidence outside of observational studies and the lack of specific therapies for children with elevated levels. Additional research is needed to improve understanding of the pro-thrombotic mechanisms of Lp(a), appropriate screening guidelines for Lp(a) in the pediatric population, and to elucidate the short and long term effects of elevated Lp(a) on the risk of pediatric thrombosis and stroke.
childrenmechanismsstrokethrombosis
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.