lp-a.org

Mechanisms

Lp(a) and triglyceride-rich particles are several-fold more atherogenic than LDL per particle, review on combination therapy (Pharmacol Ther 2026)

Original title: Clinical relevance of per-particle atherogenicity of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, Lp(a) and LDL for cardiovascular risk

Pharmacol Ther · · 6

Björnson E, Packard CJ, Borén J

Review comparing the per-particle atherogenicity of the three apoB-containing lipoprotein classes: LDL, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and Lp(a). Genetic evidence indicates TRLs and Lp(a) are several-fold more atherogenic per particle than LDL for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, though both circulate at much lower particle numbers than LDL. The authors weigh these countervailing factors to assess each lipoprotein's net contribution to risk, and argue that while LDL lowering remains the cornerstone of apoB-related risk reduction, eliminating residual risk will require combination therapies that also target TRLs and/or Lp(a) rather than LDL lowering alone.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Circulating apoB-containing lipoproteins fall into three principal categories- low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. These three different lipoproteins are all causally related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and together account for the full spectrum of apoB-related atherogenic risk. They vary substantially in metabolic and kinetic properties, size and lipid composition and may affect the atherosclerotic pathogenic process differently. Indeed, genetic evidence indicates that TRLs and Lp(a) are several-fold more atherogenic per particle than LDL in terms of ASCVD risk. On the other hand, Lp(a) and TRLs are typically much less abundant than LDL. How should these countervailing factors be balanced to understand their net contribution to risk? In this review, we summarize the evidence relating to the atherogenicity of LDLs, TRLs and Lp(a) and explore the implications for risk stratification and therapeutic strategies. We argue that LDL lowering will remain the cornerstone of apoB-related risk reduction, but eradication of residual risk necessitates combination therapies targeting TRLs and/or Lp(a) in addition to LDL.

mechanismsrisktherapy

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.