Epidemiology
Lp(a) and insulin resistance jointly raise cardiovascular risk 32%, UK Biobank cohort of 328,031 (J Am Heart Assoc 2026)
Original title: Lipoprotein(a), Insulin Resistance, and Cardiovascular Disease in the UK Biobank
Prospective UK Biobank cohort of 328,031 participants without baseline cardiovascular disease (mean age 56.4, 54.7% women), testing whether insulin resistance (triglyceride-glucose index, TyG) modifies the Lp(a)-cardiovascular disease association. Over a median 14.6 years (26,865 events), each 1-SD increase in log-Lp(a) carried an adjusted HR of 1.08 (95% CI 1.06-1.09) and each 1-SD increase in TyG an adjusted HR of 1.06 (95% CI 1.04-1.07), independent of each other, with no significant multiplicative interaction (p=0.07). Versus the reference group (Lp(a) below 125 nmol/L, low IR), adjusted HRs were 1.15 for high Lp(a) with low IR, 1.09 for low Lp(a) with high IR, and 1.32 for high Lp(a) with high IR combined. The authors conclude Lp(a) and insulin resistance each independently contribute to cardiovascular risk, and combining them improves risk stratification in primary prevention.
Original abstract
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) and lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), are established contributors to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Whether IR modifies the association between Lp(a) and CVD in primary prevention remains uncertain.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included UK Biobank participants without baseline CVD. IR at enrollment was assessed using the triglyceride-glucose index (TyG). The primary outcome was first major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for log-transformed Lp(a) and TyG, adjusting for each other. Lp(a) was categorized as <125 or ≥125 nmol/L; high IR was TyG ≥75th cohort percentile. Participants were stratified into 4 joint Lp(a)/IR groups using low Lp(a)/low IR as reference.
Results: Among 328 031 participants (mean age 56.4 years; 54.7% women), 26 865 CVD events occurred over 14.6 years median follow-up (interquartile range 13.7-15.4). Per 1-SD increase, aHRs were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for log-Lp(a) and 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04-1.07) for TyG, each adjusted for the other. The P-value for the multiplicative interaction between TyG and Lp(a) was 0.07. Relative to reference, aHRs (95% CI) were 1.15 (1.10-1.20) for ≥125/low IR, 1.09 (1.06-1.12) for <125/high IR, and 1.32 (1.24-1.41) for ≥125/high IR.
Conclusions: Lp(a) and IR each independently contribute to cardiovascular risk, with a combination offering improved risk stratification. This suggests that accounting for IR may enhance the assessment of Lp(a)-associated risk in the context of primary CVD prevention setting.
diabetesepidemiologyrisk prediction
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.