lp-a.org

Inflammation

Dual-high Lp(a) and inflammatory-lipid index carries an 8-fold MACE risk in 1,910 ACS patients with type 2 diabetes (Front Cardiovasc Med 2026)

Original title: Combined prognostic value of lipoprotein(a) and an integrated inflammatory-lipid index in patients with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Front Cardiovasc Med · · 7

Li T, Cong H, Wang L, Ruo W, Li W

This cohort study analysed 1,910 patients with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes over a median follow-up of 5.5 years, testing the combined prognostic value of lipoprotein(a) and a novel Inflammatory-Lipid Index (hs-CRP times ApoB/ApoA1). Both markers independently predicted major adverse cardiovascular events in multivariable Cox models, with significant non-linear, positive associations for each (both P for non-linearity < 0.001). Patients in the dual-high subgroup had a 57.7% MACE incidence, an 8-fold higher risk than the dual-low reference group (HR 8.01, 95% CI 4.41-14.56, P < 0.001), and adding both markers to a conventional risk model improved discrimination and reclassification (C-statistic 0.741, NRI 0.569, IDI 0.053, all P < 0.001). A large, long-follow-up cohort supporting combined Lp(a) and inflammatory-lipid assessment in ACS patients with diabetes, though the Inflammatory-Lipid Index itself awaits external validation.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background And Aims: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and inflammation are critical drivers of residual risk. We aimed to evaluate the combined prognostic value of Lp(a) and a novel Inflammatory-Lipid Index [defined as hs-CRP × (ApoB/ApoA1)] in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods And Results: A total of 1,910 patients with ACS and T2DM were analyzed over a median follow-up of 5.5 years. Multivariable Cox regression confirmed that both Lp(a) and the Inflammatory-Lipid Index were independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Restricted cubic splines revealed significant non-linear, positive correlations between these markers and MACE risk (both P for non-linearity <0.001). Patients were stratified into four subgroups based on median values. Those in the dual-high group [high Lp(a) and high Inflammatory-Lipid Index] had the highest risk, with a MACE incidence of 57.7% and an 8-fold higher risk compared to the dual-low reference (HR: 8.01; 95% CI: 4.41-14.56; P < 0.001). Formal interaction analysis showed that the multiplicative interaction term was not statistically significant, whereas additive interaction analysis suggested an excess joint risk on the additive scale. Addition of both biomarkers to the conventional risk model improved predictive performance and reclassification (C-statistic: 0.741; NRI: 0.569; IDI: 0.053; all P < 0.001). In a sensitivity analysis using 3-point MACE, the overall pattern of association remained similar.

Conclusions: Concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and the Inflammatory-Lipid Index identifies a particularly high-risk phenotype among ACS patients with T2DM. This dual-biomarker approach significantly enhances cardiovascular risk stratification beyond traditional factors.

diabetesepidemiologyinflammationrisk prediction

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.