Epidemiology
Every 50 mg/dL rise in Lp(a) raises cardiovascular death risk by up to 31%, a dose-response meta-analysis of 957,253 people across 75 studies (Eur J Epidemiol 2023)
Original title: Circulating lipoprotein (a) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis pooled 43 publications reporting 75 studies (957,253 participants) on circulating Lp(a) and all-cause or cause-specific mortality. Comparing the top versus bottom Lp(a) tertile, all-cause mortality risk was higher in the general population (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18) and in patients with cardiovascular disease (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34). Cardiovascular mortality risk was higher in the general population (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.58), in patients with cardiovascular disease (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.43), and especially in patients with diabetes (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.13-5.64). Each 50 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) was linearly associated with 31% and 15% greater cardiovascular death risk in the general population and in those with cardiovascular disease respectively. The findings support ESC/EAS guideline recommendations that Lp(a) be measured at least once in every adult lifetime.
Original abstract
Aims: To investigate the association between circulating lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population and in patients with chronic diseases, and to elucidate the dose-response relations.
Methods And Results: We searched literature to find prospective studies reporting adjusted risk estimates on the association of Lp(a) and mortality outcomes. Forty-three publications, reporting on 75 studies (957,253 participants), were included. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI ) for the top versus bottom tertile of Lp(a) levels and risk of all-cause mortality were 1.09 (95%CI: 1.01-1.18, I2: 75.34%, n = 19) in the general population and 1.18 (95%CI: 1.04-1.34, I2: 52.5%, n = 12) in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The HRs for CVD mortality were 1.33 (95%CI: 1.11-1.58, I2: 82.8%, n = 31) in the general population, 1.25 (95%CI: 1.10-1.43, I2: 54.3%, n = 17) in patients with CVD and 2.53 (95%CI: 1.13-5.64, I2: 66%, n = 4) in patients with diabetes mellitus. Linear dose-response analyses revealed that each 50 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) levels was associated with 31% and 15% greater risk of CVD death in the general population and in patients with CVD. No non-linear dose-response association was observed between Lp(a) levels and risk of all-cause or CVD mortality in the general population or in patients with CVD (Pnonlinearity > 0.05).
Conclusion: This study provides further evidence that higher Lp(a) levels are associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and CVD-death in the general population and in patients with CVD. These findings support the ESC/EAS Guidelines that recommend Lp(a) should be measured at least once in each adult person's lifetime, since our study suggests those with higher Lp(a) might also have higher risk of mortality.
diabetesDutch researchepidemiologyrisk prediction
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.