Testing
Only 0.25% of 2.4 million patients in a US healthcare network have ever had Lp(a) measured, with striking demographic testing gaps (J Clin Lipidol 2023)
Original title: Prevalence of lipoprotein(a) measurement in patients with or at risk of cardiovascular disease
In a retrospective case-control study of patient charts (January 2017 to June 2022) across a US healthcare network, only 5,942 of 2,412,020 patients (0.25%) had ever had Lp(a) measured. Among 84,581 patients in primary care or cardiology clinics who met Lp(a) screening criteria, only 1,311 (1.55%) had been tested. Patients tested were more likely to be younger, non-Hispanic/Latinx, and to have had a lipid panel or cardiac CT; patients with established cardiovascular disease, heart failure, aortic stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, or stroke were not disproportionately tested. An abnormal or risk-enhancing Lp(a) result was associated with being female and/or Black/African American. The findings expose a substantial gap between Lp(a) awareness and actual testing, even in patients meeting screening criteria.
Original abstract
Introduction: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve disease. Despite recommendations from professional societies in the cardiovascular field, the awareness of elevated Lp(a) as a risk factor and screening for Lp(a) are suspected to be low.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational case control study of patient charts from January 1, 2017 to June 19, 2022. The primary aims were 1) to describe the proportion of patients at the healthcare network's primary care and cardiology clinics that met Lp(a) screening criteria and were tested; and 2) to describe the proportion of patients throughout the entire healthcare network that had Lp(a) measured.
Results: Of the 2,412,020 patient charts in the health network, only 5,942 (0.25 %) had Lp(a) measured. Of the 84,581 patients in primary care or cardiology clinics who met screening criteria, only 1,311 (1.55 %) had Lp(a) measured. Patients with Lp(a) measured were more likely to be younger, non-Hispanic/Latinx, had a lipid panel measured, a cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging study, and higher low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Patients with ASCVD, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, aortic stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, or a stroke did not feature highly among patients who received Lp(a) testing. Having an abnormal or risk-enhancing Lp(a) level was associated with being female and/or being Black/African American.
Conclusions: Despite increased awareness of Lp(a) and its contribution to cardiovascular disease there exists a paucity of testing. Increased Lp(a) testing can identify patients who have an increased cardiovascular risk underestimated by other metrics.
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.