lp-a.org

Epidemiology

1 in 7 Americans has Lp(a) above the risk threshold, and Lp(a) predicts heart attack but not stroke in a nationally representative cohort of 8214 (J Clin Lipidol 2020)

Original title: Lipoprotein(a) levels and association with myocardial infarction and stroke in a nationally representative cross-sectional US cohort

J Clin Lipidol · · 7

Brandt EJ, Mani A, Spatz ES, Desai NR, Nasir K

In a cross-sectional analysis of the nationally representative NHANES III cohort (1991-1994), median Lp(a) was 14 mg/dL (IQR 3-32) among 8214 participants, and 14.7% (95% CI 13.6%-15.9%) had Lp(a) at or above 50 mg/dL, the guideline threshold for a risk-enhancing factor. Median Lp(a) was highest in non-Hispanic Black participants (35 mg/dL), followed by non-Hispanic White (12 mg/dL) and Mexican American participants (8 mg/dL). In multivariate analysis, each SD increase in Lp(a) was associated with myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.75, P=.001) but not stroke (1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26), with the MI association strongest in Mexican Americans (2.14, 95% CI 1.29-3.55, P=.003) and absent in women and non-Hispanic Black participants. The findings show 1 in 7 Americans has Lp(a) above the risk-enhancing threshold, with Lp(a) linked to nonfatal MI but not stroke and notable differences by sex and race/ethnicity.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has not been well-studied in a nationally representative US cohort.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of Lp(a) and its associations with nonfatal cardiovascular events in a nationally representative cohort.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III cohort (1991-1994). We compared Lp(a) levels across demographics and tested the associations between Lp(a) and patient-reported nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and/or stroke using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Median Lp(a) was 14 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR]: 3, 32) (n = 8214). 14.7% (95% CI: 13.6%-15.9%) had Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL. Women had slightly higher median Lp(a) than men (14 mg/dL [IQR: 4, 33] vs 13 [(IQR: 3, 30], P = .001). Non-Hispanics blacks had the highest median Lp(a) (35 mg/dL [IQR: 21, 64]), followed by non-Hispanic whites (12 mg/dL [IQR: 3, 29]) and Mexican Americans (8 mg/dL [IQR:1, 21]). In multivariate analysis, Lp(a) was associated (odds ratio per SD increase [95% CI], P-value) with MI (1.41 [1.14-1.75], P = .001), but not stroke (1.14 [0.91-1.44], P = .26). Lp(a) associated with MI in men (1.52 [1.13-2.04], P = .006), non-Hispanic whites (1.60 [1.27-2.03], P < .001), and Mexican Americans (2.14 [1.29-3.55], P = .003), but not women or non-Hispanic blacks. Lp(a) was not associated with stroke among any subgroups.

Conclusion: In a nationally representative US cohort, 1 in 7 had Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL, the guidelines-recommended threshold to consider Lp(a) a risk enhancing factor. Lp(a) was associated with nonfatal MI but not stroke, although there were differential associations by sex and race/ethnicity. Future nationally representative cohorts should test Lp(a) to get an updated estimation.

ancestryepidemiologyrisk prediction

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.