lp-a.org

Epidemiology

Elevated Lp(a) predicts mortality only in high traditional cardiovascular risk, NHANES III cohort with follow-up to 2019 (Eur J Prev Cardiol 2026)

Original title: The Additive Prognostic Value of Lipoprotein(a) for All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Across the Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Continuum: Analysis from NHANES III (1988-1994) with Follow-Up to 2019

Eur J Prev Cardiol · · 7

Al-Jarshawi M, Chew N, Bonaca MP, Ray KK, Mamas MA

Nationally representative NHANES III cohort (1988-1994, mortality follow-up to 2019; 55,050,155 weighted records, 4707 unweighted, mean age 48, 51% female), stratified by baseline traditional cardiovascular risk (PREVENT equations: low, borderline-intermediate, high), testing whether Lp(a)'s prognostic value for mortality differs by risk category. Over a mean 22.4-year follow-up (17,301,805 all-cause and 4,965,456 cardiovascular deaths), elevated Lp(a) (above 50 mg/dL) was present in 15% overall, more common in the high-risk group (15% vs 11% in low-risk). In the high-risk group, Lp(a) above 75 mg/dL was associated with higher all-cause (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53) and cardiovascular mortality (sHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.36); Lp(a) 50-75 mg/dL showed a borderline association with all-cause mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00-1.34) but not cardiovascular mortality. No significant associations appeared in lower-risk groups. The authors conclude Lp(a)'s prognostic value is greatest among those already at high traditional cardiovascular risk.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Introduction: Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for a variety of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether its prognostic value differs between individuals with varying baseline traditional CV risk. This study aims to evaluate the association between Lp(a) levels and all-cause & CV mortality, stratified by baseline CV risk.

Methods: Using data from NHANES III (1988-1994) with mortality follow-up through 2019, we analysed a nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults. Baseline CV risk was stratified into low, borderline-intermediate, and high groups using the PREVENT equations. Associations between Lp(a) levels and outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray competing risk models.

Results: A total of 55,050,155 survey-weighted records (4,707 unweighted) were analysed. The mean age was 48 (±13) years, with 51% female. Over a mean follow-up of 22.4 years (±7.07), there were 17,301,805 all-cause and 4,965,456 CV deaths. Elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) was present in 15% overall, more commonly in the high-risk group (15% vs 11% in low-risk). In the high-risk group, Lp(a) >75 mg/dL was associated with higher all-cause (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.02-1.53) and CV mortality (sHR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09-1.36). Lp(a) 50-75 mg/dL showed a borderline association with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.00-1.34) but not CV mortality (sHR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.98-1.15). No significant associations were observed in lower-risk groups.

Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) levels (> 75 mg/dL) are associated with increased all-cause and CV mortality among individuals with high baseline traditional CV risk, as defined by the AHA's PREVENT score, independent of traditional risk factors. Our findings highlight the value of Lp(a) particularly among those with elevated baseline risk, where its prognostic utility appears greatest.

ancestryepidemiologyrisk prediction

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.