Statins
Statins do not lower Lp(a), yet Lp(a) still predicts residual cardiovascular risk after statin therapy, a JUPITER trial analysis of 9612 participants (Circulation 2014)
Original title: Lipoprotein(a) concentrations, rosuvastatin therapy, and residual vascular risk: an analysis from the JUPITER Trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)
This analysis of the JUPITER trial measured baseline and on-treatment Lp(a) in 9,612 multiethnic participants randomised to rosuvastatin 20 mg/day or placebo, with primary outcomes reported for 7,746 white participants. Median Lp(a) was highest in Black participants (60 nmol/L), then Asian (38), Hispanic (24), and white participants (23, P<0.001). Rosuvastatin produced a small but significant upward shift in the Lp(a) distribution despite a median change of zero (P<0.0001). Baseline Lp(a) predicted incident cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.18 per 1-SD increment in log Lp(a), 95% CI 1.03-1.34, P=0.02), and on-statin Lp(a) predicted residual cardiovascular risk (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59, P=0.04), independent of LDL cholesterol. Rosuvastatin significantly reduced cardiovascular events in participants with Lp(a) at or above the median (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.90) and below the median (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.72), with no interaction between Lp(a) and treatment benefit. The findings show Lp(a) is a significant determinant of residual cardiovascular risk after potent statin therapy, though statins provide similar relative benefit regardless of Lp(a) level.
Original abstract
Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density lipoprotein-like particle largely independent of known risk factors and predictive of cardiovascular disease. Statins may offset the risk associated with elevated Lp(a), but it is unknown whether Lp(a) is a determinant of residual risk in the setting of low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after potent statin therapy.
Methods And Results: Baseline and on-treatment Lp(a) concentrations were assessed in 9612 multiethnic participants in the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) before and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo, with outcomes reported for whites (n=7746). Lp(a) concentrations (median [25th-75th percentile], in nmol/L) were highest in blacks (60 [34-100]), then Asians (38 [18-60]), Hispanics (24 [11-46]), and whites (23 [10-50]; P<0.001). Although the median change in Lp(a) with rosuvastatin and placebo was zero, rosuvastatin nonetheless resulted in a small but statistically significant positive shift in the overall Lp(a) distribution (P<0.0001). Baseline Lp(a) concentrations were associated with incident cardiovascular disease (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD increment in Ln[Lp(a)], 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.34; P=0.02). Similarly, on-statin Lp(a) concentrations were associated with residual risk of cardiovascular disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.59; P=0.04), which was independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other factors. Rosuvastatin significantly reduced incident cardiovascular disease among participants with baseline Lp(a) greater than or equal to the median (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.90) and Lp(a) less than the median (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.72), with no evidence of interaction. Similar results were obtained when analyses included nonwhites.
Conclusion: Among white JUPITER participants treated with potent statin therapy, Lp(a) was a significant determinant of residual risk. The magnitude of relative risk reduction with rosuvastatin was similar among participants with high or low Lp(a).
Clinical Trials Registration Url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.
ancestryrisk predictionstatins
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.