lp-a.org

Epidemiology

Lp(a) is roughly twice as prevalent in coronary heart disease patients as in the Czech general population, 2001-subject study (Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2026)

Original title: The prevalence of increased lipoprotein (a) in the Czech general population and in patients with coronary heart disease

Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub · · 6

Mayer O, Rajdl D, Bruthans J, Cifkova R, Filipovsky J

Case-control study of 2001 Czech subjects (1016 patients with manifest coronary heart disease [CHD], 985 general-population controls; mean age 61.5±12.5 years, 62.9% male), assessing the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in the Czech Republic. CHD patients had a higher prevalence of Lp(a) 125 nmol/L or more than controls (25.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.0001), and of Lp(a) 105 nmol/L or more (28.9% vs 14.6%, p<0.0001). In fully adjusted case-control analysis, the odds ratio for CHD was 1.69 (95% CI 1.13-2.53, p=0.011) at the 125 nmol/L threshold and 1.71 (95% CI 1.16-2.52, p=0.006) at the 105 nmol/L threshold, independent of other conventional risk factors except elevated LDL-C. The authors argue systematic Lp(a) screening is warranted in routine Czech clinical practice.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a cardiovascular risk factor (RF) with potentially high clinical impact. However, in the "real world", it remains largely overlooked, and the epidemiological circumstances of this RF have not yet been systematically studied in the Czech population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of elevated values in cardiovascular patients and in the general population of this country.

Methods: A descriptive survey and case-control study were conducted on 2001 subjects [mean age 61.5 years (±SD 12.5); 62.9% males], 1016 cases-patients with manifest coronary heart disease, (CHD), and 985 controls-a random general population sample.

Results: The CHD patients had a significantly higher prevalence of increased Lp(a) (≥125 nmol/L) than the control group (25.1 vs 12.9%, P<0.0001). We found a similar relative difference using a lower cut-off, i.e., Lp(a) ≥105 nmol/L (28.9 vs. 14.6%, P<0.0001). In case-control analysis, fully adjusted odds ratio for Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L was 1.69 (95%CI: 1.13-2.53, P=0.011), while for Lp(a) ≥105 nmol/L, 1.71 (95%CI: 1.16-2.52, P=0.006). Increased Lp(a) was also independent of other conventional RFs, and the only major coincidence we found was elevated LDL cholesterol.

Conclusions: This study showed a significantly higher prevalence of Lp(a) in patients with manifest CHD compared to the general population. The systematic screening of this RF and pharmacologic intervention are probably warranted in routine clinical practice.

ancestryepidemiologyrisk

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.