RNA therapeutics
Lp(a) drives residual cardiovascular risk after ACS, with RNA therapies pending outcome-trial confirmation, review (J Clin Med 2026)
Original title: Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Residual Cardiovascular Risk After an Acute Coronary Syndrome
Review synthesising evidence on Lp(a) as a driver of residual cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), where recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events occur in an estimated 33.4% of patients at 5 years despite modern lipid-lowering therapy. Lp(a)'s pro-inflammatory, prothrombotic and pro-atherosclerotic properties appear to contribute substantially to this residual risk after ACS or ischaemic stroke, though its prognostic value specifically after ACS remains under-studied and heterogeneous across existing studies. Lp(a) levels are predominantly genetically determined, but recent evidence of intra-individual variability has uncertain clinical significance. Novel RNA-based therapies (antisense oligonucleotides, siRNAs) and emerging gene-editing approaches achieve profound, sustained Lp(a) reductions, but whether this translates into fewer hard clinical events is still being tested in ongoing outcome trials.
Original abstract
Reducing residual cardiovascular risk following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major unmet clinical need. Despite substantial advances in lipid-lowering therapies, the risk of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after ACS remains high, with an estimated incidence of approximately 33.4% at 5 years. Residual cardiovascular risk is driven by multiple mechanisms, including persistent inflammation, a prothrombotic status, metabolic disturbances, and the presence of atherogenic lipoproteins beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a pro-inflammatory, prothrombotic, and pro-atherosclerotic lipoprotein that appears to play a major role in residual risk after ACS or ischemic stroke. Elevated Lp(a) is a well-established independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Nevertheless, evidence regarding its prognostic value specifically after ACS remains limited, with marked heterogeneity across studies, which complicates direct comparisons and interpretation. In addition, while Lp(a) levels are predominantly genetically determined, recent studies have reported intra-individual variability, although their clinical significance remains uncertain. Finally, current therapeutic options specifically targeting Lp(a) are limited. Novel RNA-based therapies, including antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs, and emerging gene-editing approaches, have demonstrated profound and sustained reductions in circulating Lp(a) levels. Yet, whether this biological effect translates into reductions in hard clinical endpoints is under evaluation in ongoing clinical trials. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the role of Lp(a) as a major contributor to residual cardiovascular risk following ACS.
epidemiologyriskRNA therapeutics
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.