lp-a.org

Epidemiology

A meta-analysis of 20,678 atrial fibrillation patients finds modestly higher Lp(a) in those with ischaemic stroke, but flags low-certainty evidence (J Clin Med 2025)

Original title: Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Clin Med · · 5

Maj B, Pruc M, Momot K, Krauz K, Kozak J, Golczyk H, Uminska J, Kotfis K, Szpinda Ł, Lis M, Peacock FW, Szarpak L

This systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane Handbook guidance, searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL through September 2025 for studies comparing Lp(a) between atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with and without ischaemic stroke. Five observational studies covering 20,678 AF patients (3,104 with ischaemic stroke) were included; pooled analysis found significantly higher Lp(a) in stroke patients than non-stroke controls (mean difference 2.42 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.68-4.16, P = 0.007). The authors caution that Lp(a) testing is not currently endorsed in AF guidelines, and that these findings carry substantial heterogeneity, a predominance of Chinese cohorts, and exceedingly low certainty by GRADE assessment, calling for larger, multi-ethnic, rigorously designed prospective studies before Lp(a) can be considered an independent stroke risk factor in AF.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background/Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant contributor to ischemic stroke; however, existing thromboembolic risk scores exhibit only moderate predictive accuracy. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), a genetically determined lipoprotein characterized by proatherogenic and prothrombotic properties, may play a role in cardioembolic events in AF. Nonetheless, its clinical relevance in this context remains ambiguous. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to look at the differences in circulating Lp(a) levels between AF patients who had an ischemic stroke and those who did not, as well as to see if Lp(a) could help figure out who is at risk of thromboembolic events. Methods: A thorough search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL until September 2025, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Eligible studies encompassed adults with AF and accessible data on Lp(a) concentrations, contrasting individuals with and without ischemic stroke. Results: Five observational studies involving 20,678 atrial fibrillation patients (3104 with ischemic stroke) were incorporated. The pooled analysis revealed markedly elevated Lp(a) concentrations in stroke patients relative to non-stroke controls (MD = 2.42 mg/dL; 95% CI 0.68-4.16; p = 0.007). Conclusions: While Lp(a) testing is not presently endorsed in AF guidelines, our results indicate a possible correlation with ischemic stroke risk. Nonetheless, these findings must be regarded with caution owing to significant heterogeneity, the predominance of Chinese cohorts, and the exceedingly low certainty of evidence as per GRADE assessment. Additional extensive, multi-ethnic, and rigorously designed prospective studies are necessary to ascertain whether Lp(a) constitutes an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation.

epidemiologystroke

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.