Epidemiology
Nearly 20% of tested Kazakhstani patients have elevated Lp(a), but the marker discriminates atherosclerosis poorly on its own, 3,727-patient study finds (J Clin Med 2025)
Original title: Ethnic Variation in Lipoprotein(a) Levels in the Kazakhstan Population
This retrospective single-centre study analysed 3,727 patients aged 18 or older who underwent Lp(a) testing in Kazakhstan between January 2023 and June 2024, stratified by self-reported ethnicity and coronary-angiography-confirmed atherosclerosis status, to fill a data gap in this under-studied Central Asian region. Elevated Lp(a) (50 mg/dL or above) was found in 19.6% of the population; Kazakhs showed a slightly higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) than Russians, but no statistically significant difference in Lp(a) levels emerged between ethnic groups. ROC analysis showed limited discriminatory power for Lp(a) alone in diagnosing atherosclerosis (AUC 0.5464), though precision-recall analysis found high sensitivity and precision at lower thresholds in both Kazakh and Russian subgroups. The authors conclude that despite modest ethnic variation in distribution, Lp(a) alone is a weak standalone atherosclerosis marker, arguing for population-specific thresholds and its incorporation into broader cardiovascular risk assessment in Central Asia.
Original abstract
Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetically determined lipoprotein that plays an independent role in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Ethnic differences in Lp(a) levels are well-documented, yet regional data from Central Asia, particularly Kazakhstan, remain scarce. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving 3727 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent Lp(a) testing between January 2023 and June 2024. Participants were stratified by self-reported ethnicity and atherosclerosis status confirmed via coronary angiography. Lp(a) levels were analyzed using immunoturbidimetric assays. Results: Elevated Lp(a) levels (≥50 mg/dL) were identified in 19.6% of the total population. While Kazakhs exhibited a slightly higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) compared to Russians, there were no statistically significant differences in Lp(a) levels across ethnic groups. ROC analysis revealed limited discriminatory power of Lp(a) for diagnosing atherosclerosis (AUC = 0.5464), although PRC analysis showed high sensitivity and precision in both Kazakh and Russian subgroups at lower thresholds. Conclusions: Despite modest ethnic variation in Lp(a) distribution, its predictive value for atherosclerosis remains limited as a standalone marker. These findings highlight the need for population-specific thresholds and support incorporating Lp(a) testing in broader cardiovascular risk assessment strategies in Central Asia.
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.