Guidelines
What the suboptimal rollout of LDL-C therapy should teach the field before Lp(a)-lowering drugs reach the clinic, Sarraju and Nissen argue (Am J Prev Cardiol 2025)
Original title: From LDL-C to lipoprotein(a) - those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it
This review by Sarraju and Nissen argues that despite cost-effective statins and multiple non-statin LDL-C-lowering options, LDL-C goal attainment and treatment uptake have remained suboptimal, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US and globally as a result. With lipoprotein(a) now a leading target for multiple pharmacologic development programs and clinical outcomes trials underway, the authors draw lessons from LDL-C therapy's implementation shortfalls, patient identification, treatment initiation, adherence, and access, to argue these same gaps could blunt the real-world benefit of future Lp(a)-lowering therapies once approved. A forward-looking opinion piece from established lipidology leaders rather than new trial data, aimed at shaping implementation planning ahead of anticipated Lp(a) drug approvals.
Original abstract
Reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a critical component of managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. However, LDL-C goal attainment and the use of LDL-C lowering therapies, which include cost-effective statins and multiple non-statin therapies, have remained suboptimal. In this setting, ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US and globally. Due to persistent ASCVD risk despite LDL-C lowering, there has been strong interest in approaches to identify factors contributing to residual ASCVD risk beyond LDL-C levels. In particular, lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] has emerged as a leading target for multiple ongoing development programs of novel, potent pharmacologic agents that decrease Lp (a) levels, with ongoing clinical trials evaluating their effects on ASCVD events. This review outlines key lessons learned from the suboptimal implementation of LDL-C therapies that may be relevant to better implementation of future residual ASCVD risk reduction strategies, particularly for Lp (a) therapies that may be proven in clinical trials and approved by regulatory authorities in the future.
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.