lp-a.org

Inflammation

Elevated Lp(a) plus high hs-CRP together confer the highest ASCVD risk, pooled 15,933-person ARIC/FOS/MESA analysis finds, especially in men and at intermediate baseline risk (Nutrients 2025)

Original title: Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Impact of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Risk Variability Among Human Clinical Subgroups

Nutrients · · 8

Hoogeveen RC, Diffenderfer MR, Lim E, Liu CT, Ikezaki H, Guan W, Tsai MY, Ballantyne CM

This pooled analysis combined the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Framingham Offspring Study and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, following 15,933 ASCVD-free participants for 10 years (9.7% incident ASCVD, 7.4% incident CHD) to test whether hs-CRP modifies Lp(a)'s association with ASCVD risk. Compared with Lp(a) below 10 mg/dL, Lp(a) of 50 mg/dL or above carried significantly higher ASCVD risk (HR 1.31) and CHD risk (HR 1.49); this association was stronger in men and non-Black individuals and was independent of diabetes status. Among those at intermediate 10-year risk (7.5% or above), Lp(a) of 50 mg/dL or above still predicted higher risk (HR 1.32). A significant interaction was found between Lp(a) and hs-CRP, with individuals having both elevated Lp(a) and elevated hs-CRP carrying the highest ASCVD risk of all groups. The authors conclude Lp(a)'s risk-enhancing value is amplified by concomitant inflammation and is most clinically useful at intermediate baseline risk.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background/Objectives: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with increased incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to assess the utility of Lp(a) as an ASCVD risk-enhancing factor, as recommended by the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines on ASCVD primary prevention, and to determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) modifies the association of elevated Lp(a) with ASCVD risk. Methods: Lp(a), high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), and other ASCVD risk factors, including blood lipids, blood pressure, diabetes status, body weight and height, and smoking, were measured in 15,933 participants (median age 61.7 years with 25th-75th percentiles 57-68 years, 56.7% female, 19.7% Black, free of ASCVD at baseline) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Framingham Offspring Study, and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Participants were followed for 10 years for incident ASCVD (coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke) and CHD (including angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass but minus stroke). These endpoints occurred in 9.7% and 7.4% of subjects, respectively. Results: Compared with the lowest Lp(a) category (<10 mg/dL), the highest Lp(a) category (≥50 mg/dL) carried a significantly increased incidence of ASCVD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.50; p < 0.001) and CHD (HR = 1.49; 95%CI 1.27-1.75; p < 0.001). The association of elevated Lp(a) with incident ASCVD was stronger in males and non-Black individuals and was independent of diabetes status. Lp(a) levels ≥ 50 mg/dL predicted the 10-year ASCVD risk for those at intermediate risk (≥7.5%, HR = 1.32; 95%CI 1.15-1.52; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between Lp(a) and hs-CRP; individuals with concomitant elevated levels of Lp(a) and hs-CRP had the highest ASCVD risk. Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with increased ASCVD risk, particularly in individuals with concomitantly elevated hs-CRP levels and those at intermediate 10-year ASCVD risk.

ancestryepidemiologyinflammation

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.