lp-a.org

Testing

Lp(a) testing rose 109% over five years at a UAE quaternary centre, and abnormal Lp(a) tracked with cardiovascular disease in 5,677 tested patients (Front Cardiovasc Med 2024)

Original title: Trends and findings of lipoprotein(a) testing and associated cardiovascular disease profiles: a large single-center study from the Middle East-Gulf region

Front Cardiovasc Med · · 6

Manla Y, AbdelWareth L, Shantouf R, Aljabery Y, St John TL, Sabbour H, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Almahmeed W

In a single quaternary-care centre in the United Arab Emirates, 5,677 patients (0.95% of the total patient population) had Lp(a) measured between July 2017 and October 2023, with a median level of 32 [11-82] nmol/L. Lp(a) testing rose 109% from 2018 to 2022, alongside an increase in abnormal findings (Lp(a) >125 nmol/L) from 11.8% to 16.4% (P=0.02). Overall, 15.9% of tests were abnormal, and these patients had higher rates of prevalent cardiovascular disease (34% vs 25.1%, P<0.001), coronary artery disease (25.6% vs 17.7%, P<0.001), heart failure (6.5% vs 3.8%, P<0.001), and stroke (7.1% vs 4.4%, P<0.001) than those with normal Lp(a). The findings document growing Lp(a) testing awareness and its cardiovascular relevance in an understudied Middle East-Gulf population.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Limited data are available on Lp(a) testing from the Middle-East region. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the utilization and yield of Lp(a) testing over time and characterize CVD profiles of patients with abnormal Lp(a) tasting at a single-quaternary-care center in the United Arab Emirates.

Methods: Unique Lp(a) tests conducted between 07/2017 and 10-2023 were included. Overtime trends in Lp(a) test utilization and abnormal Lp(a) [defined as Lp(a) > 125 nmol/L] test findings were described. CVD rates in patients with abnormal Lp(a) were compared to those with Lp(a) ≤ 125 nmol/L using appropriate methods.

Results: In our center, 0.95% of the patients (n = 5,677) had their Lp(a) measured, with a median level of 32 [11-82] nmol/L. Lp(a) was abnormal in 15.9% of the tests. Over the years 2018-2022, there was a 109% increase in Lp(a) testing, with concomitant up-trends in findings of abnormal Lp(a) (11.8% to 16.4%, P = 0.02). Compared to patients with Lp(a) ≤ 125 nmol/I, those with abnormal Lp(a) had higher rates of any prevalent CVD (34% vs. 25.1%, P < 0.001), CAD (25.6% vs. 17.7%, P < 0.001), HF (6.5% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.001), and stroke (7.1% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Almost one in six patients tested for Lp(a) had abnormally elevated Lp(a), and CVD was prevalent in one-third of the patients who tested abnormal for Lp(a). The study highlights the growing awareness of the relevance of Lp(a) for CVD risk stratification and prevention.

ancestryepidemiologytesting

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.