lp-a.org

Therapy

Elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) predicts failure to reach LDL-C targets in 870 patients with stable coronary artery disease (Clin Investig Arterioscler 2024)

Original title: Lipoprotein (a) is a predictor of non-achievement of LDL-C goals in patients with chronic heart disease

Clin Investig Arterioscler · · 6

Gómez-Barrado JJ, Gómez-Turégano P, Beltrán Moreno M, Fernández-Chamorro AI, Roque Rodríguez B, Kounka Z

In a cross-sectional study of 870 patients with stable coronary artery disease in Spain, 30.8% had Lp(a) above 50 mg/dL. These patients had higher baseline (142.30 vs 130.47 mg/dL, P=0.0001) and current (72.91 vs 64.72 mg/dL, P=0.0001) LDL-C despite more frequent use of high-potency statins (77.2% vs 70.9%) and combination lipid-lowering therapy (37.7% vs 25.7%, P=0.001). High-potency statin use (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.08-2.14), combination therapy with ezetimibe (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.45-2.73), and failure to reach LDL-C <=55 mg/dL (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.63-3.23) independently predicted elevated Lp(a). The findings show that elevated Lp(a) hinders LDL-C goal attainment in very-high-risk patients, strengthening the case for Lp(a)-directed therapies.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Introduction And Objectives: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentration influences serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. How it influences the achievement of LDL-C targets established in the guidelines is not well studied. Our aim was to know the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) levels in patients with coronary artery disease, and to assess its influence on the achievement of LDL-C targets.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a cardiology department in Spain. A total of 870 patients with stable coronary artery disease had their lipid profile determined, including Lp(a). Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to Lp(a)>50mg/dL and Lp(a)≤50mg/dL. The association of Lp(a)>50mg/dL with achievement of LDL-C targets was assessed by logistic regression analysis.

Results: The prevalence of Lp(a)>50mg/dL was 30.8%. Patients with Lp(a)>50mg/dL had higher baseline (142.30±47.54 vs. 130.47±40.75mg/dL; p=0.0001) and current (72.91±26.44 vs. 64.72±25.30mg/dL; p=0.0001), despite the fact that they were treated with more high-potency statins (77.2 vs. 70.9%; p=0.058) and more combination lipid-lowering therapy (37.7 vs. 25.7%; p=0.001). The proportion of patients achieving target LDL-C was lower in those with Lp(a)>50mg/dL. Independent predictors of having elevated Lp(a) levels>50mg/dL were the use of high-potency statins (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.08-2.14), combination lipid-lowering therapy with ezetimibe (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.45-2.73) and failure to achieve a LDL-C ≤55mg/dL (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.63-3.23).

Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) levels influence LDL-C levels and hinder the achievement of targets in patients at very high cardiovascular risk. New drugs that act directly on Lp(a) are needed in these patients.

risk predictiontherapy

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.