lp-a.org

Epidemiology

In 16,150 Chinese coronary disease patients, the lowest Lp(a) quintile, not the highest, had the most bleeding at 2 years (Thromb Haemost 2024)

Original title: Inverse Association of Lipoprotein(a) on Long-Term Bleeding Risk in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Insight from a Multicenter Cohort in Asia

Thromb Haemost · · 8

Wang P, Yuan D, Zhao X, Zhu P, Guo X, Jiang L, Xu N, Wang Z, Liu R, Wang Q, Chen Y, Zhang Y et al.

This prospective multicentre Chinese cohort enrolled 16,150 patients with coronary artery disease between January 2015 and May 2019, dividing them into Lp(a) quintiles and following them for a median 2.0 years. Bleeding occurred in 2,747 patients (17.0%) and major bleeding in 525 (3.3%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the highest bleeding incidence in Lp(a) quintile 1 (the lowest Lp(a) group) compared with quintiles 2 through 5 (p < 0.001), while major bleeding incidence was similar across groups. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed an L-shaped, inverse relationship between Lp(a) and 2-year bleeding after adjustment for confounders, with no significant association between Lp(a) and major bleeding specifically. Low, not high, Lp(a) is associated with higher bleeding risk in secondary-prevention coronary disease patients, a counterintuitive finding the authors argue clinicians should factor into shared decision-making around antithrombotic therapy.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), has been recognized as a strong risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between Lp(a) and bleeding remains indistinct, especially in the secondary prevention population of coronary artery disease (CAD). This investigation aimed to evaluate the association of Lp(a) with long-term bleeding among patients with CAD.

Methods: Based on a prospective multicenter cohort of patients with CAD consecutively enrolled from January 2015 to May 2019 in China, the current analysis included 16,150 participants. Thus, according to Lp(a) quintiles, all subjects were divided into five groups. The primary endpoint was bleeding at 2-year follow-up, and the secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 2-year follow-up.

Results: A total of 2,747 (17.0%) bleeding and 525 (3.3%) major bleeding were recorded during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the highest bleeding incidence in Lp(a) quintile 1, compared with patients in Lp(a) quintiles 2 to 5 (p < 0.001), while the incidence of major bleeding seemed similar between the two groups. Moreover, restricted cubic spline analysis suggested that there was an L-shaped association between Lp(a) and 2-year bleeding after adjustment for potential confounding factors, whereas there was no significant association between Lp(a) and 2-year major bleeding.

Conclusion: There was an inverse and L-shaped association of Lp(a) with bleeding at 2-year follow-up in patients with CAD. More attention and effort should be made to increase the clinician awareness of Lp(a)'s role, as a novel marker for bleeding risk to better guide shared-decision making in clinical practice.

ancestryepidemiologythrombosis

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.