lp-a.org

Mechanisms

Lp(a) above 60 mg/dL is linked to greater coronary plaque volume on IVUS, a pooled analysis of 3,943 patients across 6 trials (J Am Heart Assoc 2020)

Original title: Association of Serum Lipoprotein (a) Levels and Coronary Atheroma Volume by Intravascular Ultrasound

J Am Heart Assoc · · 7

Huded CP, Shah NP, Puri R, Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, Nissen SE, Cho L

In a post hoc analysis pooling 6 randomised trials using intravascular ultrasound to assess coronary atheroma, 3,943 patients were stratified by baseline Lp(a): 17.3% (683) had Lp(a) >=60 mg/dL and 82.7% (3,260) had Lp(a) <60 mg/dL. Patients with high Lp(a) had higher uncorrected LDL (107.7 vs 99.1 mg/dL) but lower Lp(a)-corrected LDL (80.6 vs 94.0 mg/dL) than those with low Lp(a). Percent atheroma volume was significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group both unadjusted (38.2% vs 37.1%, P=0.01) and after risk adjustment (38.7% vs 37.5%, P<0.001), with a significant increase across Lp(a) quintiles (37.3% to 38.5%, P=0.002). The findings show elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with greater coronary plaque burden, though further study is needed to clarify whether Lp(a)-lowering therapy changes cardiovascular outcomes.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background Lp(a) (lipoprotein (a)) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events, but the mechanism of increased risk is uncertain. This study evaluated the relationship between Lp(a) and coronary atheroma volume by intravascular ultrasound. Methods and Results This was a post hoc analysis of 6 randomized trials of coronary atheroma by intravascular ultrasound. The population was stratified into high (≥60 mg/dL) and low (<60 mg/dL) baseline serum Lp(a). The primary outcome was baseline coronary percent atheroma volume. A mixed model adjusted for baseline low density lipoprotein, ApoB (apoliporotein B100), non-high density lipoprotein, sex, age, race, history of myocardial infarction, statin use, and intravascular ultrasound study was used to provide estimates of baseline plaque burden. Of 3943 patients, 17.3% (683) had Lp(a) ≥ 60 mg/dL and 82.7% (3260) had Lp(a) < 60 mg/dL. At baseline, uncorrected low density lipoprotein level (107.7 ± 32.0 versus 99.1 ± 31.5) and statin therapy (99.0% versus 97.0%) were higher in patients with high Lp(a) levels, but low density lipoprotein corrected for Lp(a) was lower (80.6 ± 32.0 versus 94.0 ± 31.4) in patients with high Lp(a) levels. Percent atheroma volume was significantly higher in the high Lp(a) group in unadjusted (38.2% [32.8, 43.6] versus 37.1% [31.4, 43.1], P=0.01) and risk-adjusted analyses (38.7%±0.5 versus 37.5%±0.5, P<0.001). There was a significant association of increasing risk-adjusted percent atheroma volume across quintiles of Lp(a) (Lp(a) quintiles 1-5; 37.3 ± 0.5%, 37.2 ± 0.5%, 37.3 ± 0.5%, 38.0 ± 0.5%, 38.5 ± 0.5%, P=0.002). Conclusions Elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with increased percent atheroma volume. Further work is needed to clarify the relationship of Lp(a)-lowering treatment with cardiovascular outcomes.

mechanismsrisk prediction

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.