Apheresis
Lipoprotein apheresis improves myocardial perfusion and plaque burden in refractory angina patients with high Lp(a), a randomised crossover trial of 20 patients (Eur Heart J 2017)
Original title: Apheresis as novel treatment for refractory angina with raised lipoprotein(a): a randomized controlled cross-over trial
This single-blinded, randomised, sham-controlled crossover trial tested lipoprotein apheresis in 20 patients with refractory angina and Lp(a) above 500 mg/L, using 3 months of weekly blinded apheresis or sham before crossover. The primary endpoint, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, increased with apheresis (0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.63) but not sham (-0.16, 95% CI -0.33-0.02), a net treatment increase of 0.63 (95% CI 0.37-0.89, P<0.001). Apheresis also improved atherosclerotic burden by total carotid wall volume (P<0.001), exercise capacity by the 6 min walk test (P=0.001), 4 of 5 Seattle Angina Questionnaire domains (all P<0.02), and quality of life by the short form 36 physical component (P=0.001), compared with sham. The findings show lipoprotein apheresis may be an effective treatment for refractory angina with raised Lp(a), improving myocardial perfusion, plaque burden, exercise capacity and symptoms.
Original abstract
Aims: To determine the clinical impact of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with refractory angina and raised lipoprotein(a) > 500 mg/L on the primary end point of quantitative myocardial perfusion, as well as secondary end points including atheroma burden, exercise capacity, symptoms, and quality of life.
Methods: We conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial in 20 patients with refractory angina and raised lipoprotein(a) > 500 mg/L, with 3 months of blinded weekly lipoprotein apheresis or sham, followed by crossover. The primary endpoint was change in quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Secondary endpoints included measures of atheroma burden, exercise capacity, symptoms and quality of life.
Results: The primary endpoint, namely MPR, increased following apheresis (0.47; 95% CI 0.31-0.63) compared with sham (-0.16; 95% CI - 0.33-0.02) yielding a net treatment increase of 0.63 (95% CI 0.37-0.89; P < 0.001 between groups). Improvements with apheresis compared with sham also occurred in atherosclerotic burden as assessed by total carotid wall volume (P < 0.001), exercise capacity by the 6 min walk test (P = 0.001), 4 of 5 domains of the Seattle angina questionnaire (all P < 0.02) and quality of life physical component summary by the short form 36 survey (P = 0.001).
Conclusion: Lipoprotein apheresis may represent an effective novel treatment for patients with refractory angina and raised lipoprotein(a) improving myocardial perfusion, atheroma burden, exercise capacity and symptoms.
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.