Mechanisms
Whether Lp(a) directly causes thrombosis or acts only through atherosclerosis remains unresolved, a review of Lp(a) prothrombotic role (J Lipid Res 2016)
Original title: Lipoprotein (a): truly a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease?
This review by Boffa and Koschinsky examines whether Lp(a) acts as a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease, beyond its established causal role in coronary heart disease. Lp(a) combines an LDL-like lipoprotein moiety with the plasminogen-related glycoprotein apo(a), traditionally suggesting a dual pathogenic role: causing atherosclerosis through its LDL-like component and thrombosis through fibrinolysis inhibition via its plasminogen-like component. However, separating Lp(a) prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic effects from its proatherosclerotic effects has proven difficult, leaving this postulate speculative. The review summarises the biochemical basis for Lp(a) procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects and the evidence for its role in arterial and venous thrombosis, concluding that because most arterial thrombotic events are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis, Lp(a) true pathogenic mechanism and the best therapeutic target remain unclear.
Original abstract
Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been determined to be a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, and may similarly play a role in other atherothrombotic disorders. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein moiety indistinguishable from LDL, as well as the plasminogen-related glycoprotein, apo(a). Therefore, the pathogenic role for Lp(a) has traditionally been considered to reflect a dual function of its similarity to LDL, causing atherosclerosis, and its similarity to plasminogen, causing thrombosis through inhibition of fibrinolysis. This postulate remains highly speculative, however, because it has been difficult to separate the prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic functions of Lp(a) from its proatherosclerotic functions. This review surveys the current landscape surrounding these issues: the biochemical basis for procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) is summarized and the evidence addressing the role of Lp(a) in both arterial and venous thrombosis is discussed. While elevated Lp(a) appears to be primarily predisposing to thrombotic events in the arterial tree, the fact that most of these are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis continues to confound our understanding of the true pathogenic roles of Lp(a) and, therefore, the most appropriate therapeutic target through which to mitigate the harmful effects of this lipoprotein.
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.