Epidemiology
The highest Lp(a) quartile raises the risk of combined intracranial and extracranial artery narrowing five-fold in stroke patients, a Korean study of 1012 patients (Atherosclerosis 2010)
Original title: Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) as a potential predictor for combined intracranial and extracranial artery stenosis in patients with ischemic stroke
This study analysed 1012 Korean stroke or TIA patients over a 3-year period, classified by angiography into non-cerebral stenosis (654), intracranial stenosis (198), extracranial carotid stenosis (86), and combined intracranial and extracranial stenosis (74), to test whether Lp(a) predicts the extent and location of cerebral steno-occlusive disease. Lp(a) was significantly higher in large artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke than other stroke mechanisms, and higher Lp(a) was associated with more advanced intracranial (P=0.001) and extracranial stenosis (P=0.001). The third Lp(a) quartile was the strongest predictor of isolated intracranial (odds ratio 3.36, 95% CI 1.77-6.37) or extracranial stenosis (odds ratio 4.82, 95% CI 1.96-11.88), while the fourth quartile was the strongest predictor of combined intracranial and extracranial stenosis (odds ratio 4.98, 95% CI 1.92-12.91). The findings show markedly elevated Lp(a) is associated with LAA stroke and extensive cerebrovascular stenosis, suggesting a pro-atherothrombogenic role for Lp(a) in ischemic stroke.
Original abstract
Objectives: Despite compelling evidence of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a risk factor for ischemic stroke, its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Our aim is to investigate whether serum Lp(a) level is associated with the extent and location of cerebral steno-occlusive lesions, and with large artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke in Korean patients.
Methods: We analyzed data prospectively collected over a 3-year period on consecutive patients with stroke or TIA. Based on an angiographic study, a total of 1012 patients were classified into four subtypes: non-cerebral stenosis (n=654), intracranial stenosis (n=198), extracranial carotid stenosis (n=86), and combined intracranial and extracranial carotid stenosis (n=74). Independent associations of Lp(a) levels with the extent and location of cerebral stenosis were evaluated, and Lp(a) levels of subtypes by the TOAST criteria were compared.
Results: Lp(a) levels of LAA stroke were significantly higher than those of the other four stroke mechanisms. Patients with more advanced intracranial (p=0.001) and extracranial carotid stenoses (p=0.001) tended to have higher Lp(a) levels. In multiple regression analysis, the third Lp(a) quartile was the strongest risk factor for isolated intracranial (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.77-6.37) or extracranial stenosis (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.96-11.88), whereas the fourth Lp(a) quartile was the most powerful predictor for combined intracranial and extracranial carotid stenosis (OR 4.98, 95% CI 1.92-12.91).
Conclusions: Our results indicate that greatly elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with LAA stroke and extensive burden of cervicocerebral steno-occlusive lesions, which might offer indirect evidence of proatherothrombogenic role of Lp(a) in ischemic stroke.
epidemiologyrisk predictionstroke
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.