lp-a.org

Epidemiology

Lp(a) has no prognostic significance in coronary artery spasm without stenosis, 1,373-patient study (Heart Vessels 2026)

Original title: Prognostic significance of high Lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with coronary artery spasm

Heart Vessels · · 5

Ahn WJ, Rha SW, Choi BG, Choi SY, Byun JK, Lee Y, Chesario MS, Susanti M, Chu W, Lee J, Park S, Park EJ et al.

Study of 1,373 patients with positive intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing and no significant coronary stenosis, divided into high (50 mg/dL or more) and low (below 50) Lp(a) groups, followed for 10-year outcomes after inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting. No significant difference emerged between groups in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, or events including recurrent angina. Before adjustment, the high-Lp(a) group had more revascularisation (0.9% vs 3.3%, p=0.033), but this did not persist after weighting (p=0.118); recurrent angina requiring angiography was numerically more common in the low-Lp(a) group without reaching significance (25.3% vs 30.8%, p=0.615). The authors conclude Lp(a), though an established risk factor elsewhere, was not prognostic in this population with coronary spasm but no fixed stenosis or PCI.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has recently regained attention in prognostic research. However, data remain limited for patients without significant coronary artery stenosis confirmed angiographically and those who do not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and studies focusing specifically on patients with coronary artery spasm (CAS) are even more scarce. In this study, a total of 1,373 patients with positive intracoronary provocation testing with acetylcholine (ACH) and insignificant coronary artery stenosis were divided into two groups based on Lp(a) levels: the high Lp(a) group (≥50 mg/dL) and the low Lp(a) group (< 50 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE1) and MACCE1 with recurrent angina (MACCE2). Multiple imputation was followed by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and Cox regression analysis was used to analyze 10-year clinical outcomes. There was no significant difference in MACE, MACCE1, or MACCE2 between the two groups. Before IPTW adjustment, the high Lp(a) group had a higher incidence of revascularization (0.9% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.033), but this difference was not significant after IPTW adjustment (p = 0.118). Although there was no significant group difference, a notable proportion of patients experienced recurrent angina requiring angiography (25.3% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.615). In conclusion, although Lp(a) is an established independent risk factor, it did not show prognostic significance in CAS patients in the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis and PCI.

epidemiologyrisk

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.