lp-a.org

Guidelines

Gulf countries expert consensus endorses routine Lp(a) testing in cardiovascular risk assessment (Atheroscler Plus 2026)

Original title: Expert consensus on Lipoprotein(a) in the Gulf countries: Navigating cardiovascular risk and therapeutic advances

Atheroscler Plus · · 6

Almahmeed W, Sabbour H, Shantouf R, Aljaberi A, El Tamimi H, Bin Lootah F, Al Sayed N, AlAli J, Akbar M, Shehab A, AlSarraf A, Al Waili K et al.

Modified Delphi consensus from a multidisciplinary Gulf-region panel (cardiology, lipidology, endocrinology) evaluating 64 evidence-based statements across six domains covering pathophysiology, risk assessment, therapeutic strategies and implementation. Strong consensus (at least 80 percent agreement) supported routine inclusion of Lp(a) in cardiovascular risk assessment, especially for high-risk individuals, alongside aggressive management of LDL-C, apoB and non-HDL-C. Partial agreement remained on insurance coverage, referral pathways and imaging protocols, and the panel flagged the current unavailability of specific Lp(a)-lowering drugs in the region. The statements are meant to inform national guidelines and payer policy rather than report new outcome data.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is increasingly recognized as an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease including aortic valve stenosis, myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral arterial disease and CV death. Despite growing global awareness, significant gaps in diagnosis, risk stratification, and management persist in Gulf countries.

Objective: To develop regionally tailored consensus statements on the clinical management of elevated Lp(a) in Gulf countries using a modified Delphi-based methodology.

Methods: A multidisciplinary panel, mostly of Gulf-based experts in cardiology, lipidology, and endocrinology evaluated 64 evidence-based statements across six thematic domains, including pathophysiology, risk assessment, therapeutic strategies, and implementation challenges. Consensus was defined by ≥ 80% agreement, and relevant literature was reviewed to support each statement.

Results: Strong consensus supported the inclusion of Lp(a) in routine CV risk assessment, especially for high-risk individuals. The panel endorsed early detection and aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, including LDL-C, apoB, and non-HDL-C. Areas of partial agreement highlighted practical challenges, including variability in insurance coverage and the need for clearer referral pathways, imaging protocols, and outcome-driven treatment guidance and particularly the current unavailability of specific Lp(a) lowering drugs.

Conclusion: These expert recommendations provide a pragmatic framework for integrating Lp(a) into CV care pathways in Gulf countries. By aligning practice with emerging evidence, the consensus has the potential to shape national guidelines, inform payer policies, promote regional research on the epidemiology of Lp(a), and support equitable access to future Lp(a)-targeted therapies, ultimately improving long-term CV outcomes in the region.

guidelinesrisk

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.