lp-a.org

Epidemiology

Elevated Lp(a) raises repeat revascularisation risk after PCI, meta-analysis of eighteen studies (Acta Cardiol 2026)

Original title: The influence of lipoprotein(a) on coronary revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention

Acta Cardiol · · 7

Srikulmontri T, Pantarote S, Kulthamrongsri N, Wattanachayakul P, Vutthikraivit W, Amanullah A

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies through 18 June 2025 examining elevated Lp(a) and coronary revascularisation outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Twenty studies were reviewed, eighteen pooled in meta-analysis. Elevated Lp(a) was associated with higher risk of any repeat revascularisation (pooled OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.25) and target vessel revascularisation (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.12-1.81), with a non-significant trend toward higher target lesion revascularisation (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96-1.64). The authors conclude elevated Lp(a) predicts repeat revascularisation and target vessel revascularisation after PCI, warranting further study of Lp(a)-lowering strategies in this setting.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a proatherogenic lipoprotein associated with increased cardiovascular risk and is minimally responsive to statins or lifestyle changes. While Lp(a) is linked to adverse cardiovascular events, its role in predicting repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This review evaluates the relationship between Lp(a) levels and coronary revascularization outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from MEDLINE and EMBASE through June 18, 2025, evaluated the association between elevated Lp(a) and revascularization outcomes post-PCI. Random-effects models using the DerSimonian-Laird method were used to pool odds (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test, and publication bias was evaluated with Egger's regression test.

Results: Twenty studies were included in the systematic review, of which eighteen were included in the meta-analysis. Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a higher risk of any repeat revascularization, with pooled OR 1.33 (95% CI: 1.17-1.52) and HR 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05-1.25). High Lp(a) was also linked to increased risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.12-1.81). A non-significant trend towards increased target lesion revascularization (TLR) was observed (OR 1.25; 95% CI: 0.96-1.64).

Conclusion: Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a higher risk of repeat revascularization and TVR, with a non-significant trend towards increased TLR. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the potential benefit of Lp(a)-lowering strategies.

epidemiologyriskrisk prediction

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.