Aortic stenosis
Time-weighted Lp(a) outpredicts single-measurement Lp(a) for calcific aortic valve disease, cohort of 5,156 (Lipids Health Dis 2026)
Original title: Decoding calcific aortic valve disease: superior predictive power of time-weighted lipoprotein(a)
Study of 5156 inpatients with comprehensive clinical data, comparing single-measurement Lp(a) with a time-weighted Lp(a) metric (integrating age and cumulative Lp(a)) for predicting calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). CAVD prevalence rose with age, though the rate of increase slowed at older ages. Average Lp(a) in young CAVD patients (55 years or younger) was more than twice that of young patients without CAVD, and CAVD prevalence was 2 to 4-fold higher in non-elderly patients with Lp(a) above 30 mg/dL than those at or below 30 mg/dL. Adjusted odds ratios for CAVD rose with increasing Lp(a) or age, and time-weighted Lp(a) was more strongly associated with CAVD risk than Lp(a) alone, improving both sensitivity and specificity on ROC analysis. The authors conclude time-weighted Lp(a), capturing cumulative long-term variation, gives superior CAVD risk stratification compared with a single Lp(a) measurement.
Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a cardiovascular disease closely associated with aging. The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has attracted considerable attention in recent years. However, limited research has simultaneously explored the relationships between Lp(a), age, and CAVD. This study sought to assess the relationship linking Lp(a), time-weighted Lp(a), and CAVD. METHODS: A total of 5,156 inpatients with comprehensive clinical data were recruited for this study. The associations of Lp(a) and time-weighted Lp(a) with CAVD were examined via multivariate logistic regression analysis, alongside the application of restricted cubic spline analysis. The diagnostic utility of Lp(a) and time-weighted Lp(a) for CAVD was assessed by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: CAVD prevalence rose with age, whereas the rate of increase diminished with advancing age. The average Lp(a) level in the young populations with CAVD was more than twice that in the No-CAVD group, particularly among those aged 55 years or younger. The prevalence of CAVD in non-elderly populations was markedly 2–4 fold greater in the higher Lp(a) group (> 30 mg/dL) than in the lower Lp(a) group (≤ 30 mg/dL). Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for CAVD increased with advancing Lp(a) or age. Time-weighted Lp(a), which takes into account both age and Lp(a), was more strongly linked to elevated CAVD risk than Lp(a) alone. Time-weighted Lp(a) enhanced the diagnostic value of CAVD, improving both sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of CAVD is strongly associated with both age and elevated Lp(a) levels. Time-weighted Lp(a), which integrates these factors, serves as a superior indicator that better captures cumulative long-term Lp(a) variation and yields stronger CAVD risk stratification.
aortic stenosisrisk predictiontesting
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.