lp-a.org

Testing

UK national survey finds only 3 of 65 responding labs had fully adopted the 2019 HEART UK Lp(a) standardisation recommendations (Ann Clin Biochem 2024)

Original title: The current status of lipoprotein (a) measurement in clinical biochemistry laboratories in the UK: Results of a 2021 national survey

Ann Clin Biochem · · 6

Ansari S, Garmany Neely RD, Payne J, Cegla J

This 16-question electronic survey, circulated to 190 accredited UK clinical biochemistry laboratories, assessed adoption of the 2019 HEART UK consensus recommendations for standardising Lp(a) measurement and reporting. Of 65 responding laboratories (34%), only 5 (8%) did not offer Lp(a) testing at all; of those that did, 23% (14 labs) ran an in-house assay while 77% (46 labs) used an external referral service. Among in-house labs, 71% (10 of 14) specified whether their method minimised sensitivity to apo(a) isoform size and used WHO/IFCC-traceable calibrators, but only 28% (13 of 46) of referral-service labs could specify their referral laboratory's method. Reporting units also varied, with 6 of 10 in-house and 7 of 23 referral-service labs reporting in nmol/L. Overall, the HEART UK recommendations had been adopted in full by only 3 in-house laboratories among all 60 responding labs, exposing substantial gaps in Lp(a) measurement standardisation across UK clinical practice.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is now established as a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and accurate laboratory measurement is of pivotal importance in reducing Lp(a) associated risk. The consensus statement by HEART UK in 2019 included recommendations to improve standardisation of clinical laboratory measurement and reporting of Lp(a).

Methods: A 16 question, electronic audit survey was circulated to 190 accredited clinical biochemistry laboratories to assess the adoption of these recommendations in the UK.

Results: Responses were received from 65 of 190 laboratories (34%). Only 5 (8%) did not offer Lp(a) measurement. Of those providing the test, 23% (n = 14) offered an in-house service (IHS), the remaining laboratories (77%; n = 46) used an external referral service (ERS). The majority (10 of 14 or 71%) of IHS laboratories responded with details of their method, stating whether it minimised sensitivity to the effect of Lp(a) isoform size and used calibrators certified for traceability to the WHO/IFCC reference material, however, only a minority ERS laboratories (13 of the 46 or 28%) were able to specify the method used by their referral laboratory. Of the laboratories who specified their reporting units, 6 of 10 IHS and 7 of 23 ERS laboratories reported in nmol/L. Among the 60 laboratories who responded, the HEART UK recommendations appear to have been adopted in full by only 3 IHS laboratories.

Conclusions: Further efforts are needed to standardise the measurement and reporting of Lp(a) so that results and interpretation are comparable across clinical biochemistry laboratories in the UK.

testing

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.