lp-a.org

TestingLandmark

Finding very high Lp(a): the case for routine assessment (Nurmohamed et al., Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022)

Original title: Finding very high lipoprotein(a): the need for routine assessment

Eur J Prev Cardiol · · 6

Nurmohamed NS, Kaiser Y, Schuitema PCE, Ibrahim S, Nierman M, Fischer JC, Chamuleau SAJ, Knaapen P, Stroes ESG

In 12,437 patients tested at Amsterdam UMC, the 119 with Lp(a) above the 99th percentile (>388 nmol/L) had odds ratios of 2.64 for ASCVD and 3.39 for myocardial infarction versus matched patients below the 20th percentile, and adding Lp(a) reclassified 31 percent (SCORE) to 63 percent (SMART) into a higher risk category. From the Stroes group: routine measurement changes management for the top 1 percent.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Aims: To validate the reported increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk associated with very high lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and to investigate the impact of routine Lp(a) assessment on risk reclassification.

Methods And Results: We performed a cross-sectional case-control study in the Amsterdam UMC, a tertiary hospital in The Netherlands. All patients in whom a lipid blood test was ordered between October 2018 and October 2019 were included. Individuals with Lp(a) >99th percentile were age and sex matched to individuals with Lp(a) ≤20th percentile. We computed odds ratios (ORs) for myocardial infarction (MI) and ASCVD using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and systolic blood pressure. Furthermore, we assessed the additive value of Lp(a) to established ASCVD risk algorithms. Lipoprotein(a) levels were determined in 12 437 individuals, out of whom 119 cases [Lp(a) >99th percentile; >387.8 nmol/L] and 119 matched controls [Lp(a) ≤20th percentile; ≤7 nmol/L] were included. Mean age was 58 ± 15 years, 56.7% were female, and 30.7% had a history of ASCVD. Individuals with Lp(a) levels >99th percentile had an OR of 2.64 for ASCVD [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-4.89] and 3.39 for MI (95% CI 1.56-7.94). Addition of Lp(a) to ASCVD risk algorithms led to 31% and 63% being reclassified into a higher risk category for Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) and Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART), respectively.

Conclusion: The prevalence of ASCVD is nearly three-fold higher in adults with Lp(a) >99th percentile compared with matched subjects with Lp(a) ≤20th percentile. In individuals with very high Lp(a), addition of Lp(a) resulted in one-third of patients being reclassified in primary prevention, and over half being reclassified in secondary prevention.

Dutch researchepidemiologyrisk predictiontestingwomen

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 17 August 2026. Methods.