lp-a.org

Testing

Lp(a) improves 15-year cardiovascular risk prediction, especially for people at intermediate risk, the Bruneck Study of 826 adults (J Am Coll Cardiol 2014)

Original title: Discrimination and net reclassification of cardiovascular risk with lipoprotein(a): prospective 15-year outcomes in the Bruneck Study

J Am Coll Cardiol · · 8

Willeit P, Kiechl S, Kronenberg F, Witztum JL, Santer P, Mayr M, Xu Q, Mayr A, Willeit J, Tsimikas S

The Bruneck Study measured Lp(a) in 826 men and women (aged 45-84) in 1995 and recorded cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence over 15 years to test whether Lp(a) improves risk prediction beyond the Framingham and Reynolds Risk Scores. Each 1-SD higher Lp(a) (32 mg/dL) carried a hazard ratio of 1.37 for incident CVD, rising to 2.37 comparing the top quintile with the rest; adding Lp(a) to the Reynolds Risk Score increased the C-index by 0.016. Among 502 subjects who remained CVD-free, 82 were correctly reclassified to lower risk and 49 to higher risk (P<0.001); among 148 who developed CVD, 18 were correctly reclassified higher and 17 lower. In the intermediate-risk group, Lp(a) produced a net reclassification improvement of 22.5% for non-cases, 17.1% for cases, and 39.6% overall, though allele-specific Lp(a) added nothing further. The findings show elevated Lp(a) predicts 15-year cardiovascular outcomes and meaningfully improves risk prediction, particularly for people at intermediate risk.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Recent studies showed that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, whether Lp(a) modifies clinical risk assessment was not established.

Objectives: This study was conducted to determine whether Lp(a) improves CVD risk prediction.

Methods: In 1995, Lp(a) was measured in 826 men and women (age range, 45 to 84 years) from the general community. Incidence of CVD was recorded over 15 years of follow-up.

Results: In models adjusted for Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Reynolds Risk Score (RRS) variables, the hazard ratio (HR) for incident CVD was 1.37 per 1-SD higher Lp(a) level (SD = 32 mg/dl) and 2.37 when comparing the top fifth quintile with other quintiles. The addition of Lp(a) to the RRS increased the C-index by 0.016. Of the 502 subjects who remained free of CVD, 82 were correctly reclassified to a lower risk category and 49 were reclassified to a higher risk category (predicted 15-year categories: <7.5%, 7.5% to <15%, 15% to <30%, ≥30%) (p < 0.001). Of the 148 subjects who developed CVD, 18 were correctly reclassified to a higher risk category and 17 were reclassified to a lower risk category. In subjects at intermediate risk (15% to <30%), the net reclassification improvement afforded by Lp(a) was 22.5% for noncases, 17.1% for cases, and 39.6% overall. Allele-specific Lp(a) levels did not add to the predictive ability of the FRS or RRS or to Lp(a).

Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) predicts 15-year CVD outcomes and improves CVD risk prediction. These findings suggest that Lp(a) levels may be used in risk assessment of subjects in the general community, particularly in intermediate-risk groups.

epidemiologyrisk predictiontesting

Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.