Testing
Lp(a) barely changes after eating or with inflammation, and still predicts heart disease regardless, a Danish study of 34 829 people (Atherosclerosis 2014)
Original title: Lipoprotein(a): fasting and nonfasting levels, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk
This study tested whether normal food intake or inflammation affects Lp(a) levels or its ability to predict ischemic heart disease, using 34 829 people from the Copenhagen General Population Study and Copenhagen City Heart Study. Median Lp(a) was unchanged after eating (17.3 mg/dL fasting vs 19.4 mg/dL at 3-4 hours post-meal, P=0.38), and rose only minimally with higher CRP (18.0 mg/dL at CRP below 1 mg/L vs 21.1 mg/dL above 10 mg/L, P<0.001). The highest versus lowest Lp(a) tertile carried a 1.4-fold increased risk of ischemic heart disease regardless of time since last meal, and a 1.8-fold (fasting) or 1.4-fold (non-fasting) increased risk of myocardial infarction; similar consistent associations held across CRP levels. The findings show Lp(a) levels and their ability to predict ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction are unaffected by normal food intake or inflammation, supporting non-fasting Lp(a) measurement in clinical practice.
Original abstract
Objective: There are no recommendations in guidelines on measuring lipoprotein(a) in the fasting or nonfasting state, or on the influence of inflammation. We tested the hypotheses that lipoprotein(a) levels change only minimally in response to normal food intake, and to inflammation. Also, we tested whether normal food intake or inflammation influenced lipoprotein(a)'s ability to predict ischemic heart disease.
Methods: We studied 34 829 individuals from the Danish general population using the Copenhagen General Population Study and the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
Results: Lipoprotein(a) levels did not change in response to normal food intake: median fasting levels were 17.3 mg/dL, while median levels at 3-4 h since last meal were 19.4 mg/dL(p = 0.38). Lipoprotein(a) levels increased minimally with increasing levels of C-reactive protein(CRP): median lipoprotein(a) levels at CRP <1 mg/L were 18.0 mg/dL, while median levels at CRP >10 mg/L were 21.1 mg/dL(p < 0.001). Furthermore, highest versus lowest tertile of lipoprotein(a) at <3 h and ≥3 h since last meal was associated with a 1.4(95%CI:1.2-1.6) and 1.4(1.2-1.6) fold increased risk of ischemic heart disease(p = 0.82), and a 1.8(1.5-2.2) and 1.4(1.1-1.7) fold increased risk of myocardial infarction(p = 0.05). The corresponding odds ratios at CRP levels of <2 mg/L and ≥2 mg/L were 1.3(1.2-1.5) and 1.4(1.2-1.6)(p = 0.80) for ischemic heart disease, and 1.5(1.2-1.8) and 1.7(1.4-2.0)(p = 0.38) for myocardial infarction.
Conclusions: Lipoprotein(a) levels did not change in response to normal food intake, but were minimally increased at increased levels of CRP. The ability of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels to predict ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction in the general population was not affected by normal food intake or inflammation.
inflammationrisk predictiontesting
Summary written by lp-a.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.